Jamie, Thanks for your reporting... AND SUPER thanks for posting the links to the actual legislation being discussed. I believe that there should be new procedures (rules?, laws?) that require each bill to have ONE stated purpose and stick to that. As we don't have that, I don't see much wrong with Advisory Committee item. An improvement would be to let the party that holds the White House decide if they want their party in the Senate or House pick their members and then the other party in the opposite chamber pick theirs. Either way the membership of the Committee is balanced.
What concerns me about Section 230 is not the impact on FB, Twitter or others but the impact on organizations like libraries who are providing services for those that don't have access otherwise.
Thank you Jamie. I hope you get thousands of subscribers.
Jamie, Thanks for your reporting... AND SUPER thanks for posting the links to the actual legislation being discussed. I believe that there should be new procedures (rules?, laws?) that require each bill to have ONE stated purpose and stick to that. As we don't have that, I don't see much wrong with Advisory Committee item. An improvement would be to let the party that holds the White House decide if they want their party in the Senate or House pick their members and then the other party in the opposite chamber pick theirs. Either way the membership of the Committee is balanced.
What concerns me about Section 230 is not the impact on FB, Twitter or others but the impact on organizations like libraries who are providing services for those that don't have access otherwise.