20 Comments
founding

“whom most Capitol Hill reporters couldn't pick out of a single defendant police lineup.” Brutal, but a great line. The Republicans are shredding their chances of winning anything with this behavior. Maybe a big fat L for many of them in the next cycle will be what it takes to open the eyes of some of these “public servants “.

Expand full comment
author

I think the worst part about this for Republicans is that no matter who is the Speaker, there is a limit to what they can get in any negotiations with the Senate and the White House. Seriously, they should just give up right now on this year's budget and start work on FY2025, because they aren't doing anything in this extended fight which is going to help them in the short term.

Expand full comment

“...theoretically I could start playing scratch golf next week.” You are brilliant and I so appreciate your deep understanding and history of congress. Thank you for constantly reminding us “this is not normal”

Expand full comment
author

Yes, we go from 'unprecedented' to FUBAR

Expand full comment

Do I make attribution when I quote you or just say "~Web note"?

Expand full comment

“He has what it takes to go into a room with Chuck Schumer and Joe Biden and negotiate conservative wins,” - After I stopped laughing, I looked at the screen and said um no.

Expand full comment
author

Actually, the really interesting part about that quote is it comes from Nicole Malliotakis R-NY, who is a second termer from New York.

Expand full comment

Re: I turned off my tape recorder, and asked again - can Jordan win? Without missing a beat, this member of Congress instantly said, "No."

Wow.

Not sure why the House GOP isn’t working through the weekend on solving this mess. They’re putting their dysfunction on public display daily, giving Dems lots of 2024 campaign TV ad footage.

Expand full comment
author

It's just endless stuff for the Dem attack machine. And I'm not really sure that Republicans can come together anytime soon. It's just crazy.

Expand full comment

I have to assume that 'not working through the weekend' was to allow Jordan and his supporters to try to drum up the rest of the votes necessary to get him elected - but this surely is a crazy time at the big house...

Expand full comment
author

The plan is to try to build outrage back home and demand that their lawmakers vote for Jordan. Then, you put the election for Speaker on the floor and make everyone vote to see who refuses to vote for Jordan, and then put even more pressure on the holdouts.

Expand full comment

No rest for the weary. I'm sure this is not how you had the weekend planned.

Following the news about the dysfunctional House I don't know whether to laugh or cry. The last few years have left the Republican party in a huge mess. At this late date I have a hard time believing so many hard-core extremists still have their claws embedded in the GOP.

Confusion and conflict are a way of life for Democrats, but sooner or later they/we find a way to compromise with EACH OTHER. But hard--core authoritarians in the GOP are too stubborn to compromise even with each other.

Expand full comment
author

When I could talk, I would give speeches when I was on the road. I would start by talking about how I love to play golf - and if I could, I would play golf 7 days a week. Everyone had a big smile. But then I would say - but in life you have to compromise, and if I'm going to stay married, I can't play golf 7 days a week. And then I would say, that's what politics is all about - you have to compromise. And the smiles would turn to frowns, and people would literally cross their arms in disapproval. I saw it over and over and over again from audiences who would now be some of the strongest GOP supporters.

Expand full comment

Jamie…a littler confused here…435 members means 218 for majority

Everyone uses 217. Am I missing something?

Expand full comment
author

There are 433 members right now. So 217 is a majority. It will kick back up to 218 in November with two special elections

Expand full comment

Thanks. You’ve reported so many retirements I couldn’t keep track🤣

Expand full comment

"...scratch golf..." 🤣🤣🤣

Expand full comment
author

I mean, maybe I could for 9 holes

Expand full comment

I'd like to know what a power sharing arrangement could look like.

Expand full comment
author

This is where it quickly gets tricky. If you're the GOP, why do you want to voluntarily give up power?? Some of the suggestions I've heard are that Democrats would be the Speaker, but the GOP would still chair all of the committees. Dems would guarantee that funding bills come up with no restrictions (open rules for amendments). There would be a bipartisan deal to allow non-controversial bills to get to the floor from both parties - basically a more open legislative process.

Expand full comment